On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:19:44PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > options IMHO are: > > > - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term) > > - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet) > > - 3.0.x (immature, but the future) > > here the status so far: > all the money so far is on 2.6.32.x while the majority > votes for 3.0.x ... As far as I see I'm the only one who pledges for ::1 isolation, am I correct? > 2.6.32.x 2.6.38.x 3.0.x Other $$$ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Tor Rune Skoglund - - X - > Gordan Bobic - X X - > John A. Sullivan III - - X - > Roman Vesely X - - - 500 USD > Nikolay Kichukov X - - - > Michael Auckland - - X - > Mr Jarry - - - X > Corey Wright X - - - > Sandino Araico Sánchez X - - - 200 USD > Romain Riviere - X X - > > please correct me if I did misinterpret any response ... > > best, > Herbert > > > note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization > > will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to > > port such a kernel to the other branch (without need > > to redo all the testing and review) > > > please share your thoughts and preferences in this > > thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to > > > thanks in advance, > > Herbert -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="leitlhttp://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE