On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:17:52PM +0100, Tor Rune Skoglund wrote: > Sounds great to me. :) Indeed! > What are the next steps? I was waiting a little to see how the lxcfs would work out for Linux-VServer and I also think that some kind of FUSE based filesystem could help with many of the Linux-VServer related filtering and virtualization so that definitely is something we might want to investigate a little further. > I presume Herbert need to agree - do you? :) I'm fine with 5.15(+) as well, it might be rather simple to backport the changes to 5.10 lateron, so maybe both is actually an option ... I'm currently waiting for the pre x-mas rush in work and thing which needs to be done to subside and I'm also getting up-to-date with recent kernel changes which is definitely a prerequisite for this. Hope this clarifies, Herbert > - Tor Rune Skoglund > Den 09.11.2021 02:06, skrev Adrian Butterworth: >> Hi all >> EO is fine with 5.15. >> With a bit of luck it may get a few more years added, else we can raise >> funds >> (Herbert willing) for the next one that does. >> regards >> Adrian >> On Thu, November 4, 2021 22:29, Ghislain Adnet wrote: >>> Le 03/11/2021 à 16:11, Ghislain Adnet a écrit : >>>> Economic Outlook 500 => 5.10 >>>> aqueos 2500 => 5.15 >>>> roberto 200 => no preferences >>>> Tor Rune Skoglund 1000 => 5.15 >>>> Sandino Araico Sánchez 500 => 5.15 >>>> Thorsten Edler 250 => 5.15 >>>> roman 50 => ? >>> seems i was hasty. >>> Thanks for Tor Rune Skoglund for corecting me here, the consensus is >>> toward >>> 5.15 LTS and i welcome it ! :) >>> Adrian and Roman, do you have any issue if we go this route ? >>> -- >>> cordialement, >>> Ghislain ADNET. >>> AQUEOS.