Hi Daniel - How are you? Was wondering if you had a sense of "interest" at this point? I've seen some traffic around half a dozen or so people being interested, but wasn't sure if there was more interest or whether this is too small a number....do you have a sense at this point? Thanks - Ted On 11/14/13 05:59, Ghislain wrote: > Le 13/11/2013 19:59, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson a écrit : >> Hi Ted, >> >> Ted Barnes wrote: >>> Hi Daniel: >>> >>> How are you? Are you thinking of taking a swing at this? Ted >> Yeah, if there is enough interest for it compared to how much effort it >> might be, I'd gladly do it. >> >> Best, >> Daniel >> > > > I am insterested in that because hypervisor type thing could make a > lot easier the management. > > Right now we use the util vservers tools with a bunch of puppet and > home made script. I think basicaly everyone is using his home made > tools to make them work. With libvirt capability to manage the guest > we can use tools that have been developed and tied to greater parts > like openstack and such big thingy without loosing the most important > part of the virtualisation tech we love: > > - KISS principle > - Efficiency > - tech guy based solution that focus on the core thing > > > that way all the fancy work is done by hypervisor management tool and > we can plug our vserver in those systems while vserver manage the > internals for our guests. > > Perhaps the libvirt for LXC could be a good fondation for the part > they have in common with vserver (all the cgroup management part), > don't know if this is better to start from scratch or to build on top > of it. the real thing is that i really do not know how much work this > can be. I heard from previous discution that the network part was the > issue that came up the most has vserver isolate where all other > virtualize this part. > > > regards, > Ghislain.