Subject: Re: [vserver] question about util-vserver without dietlibc
From: Steve Kieu <msh.computing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:55:13 +1100
Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:55:13 +1100
>
> the question which comes to my mind here is: why the hell
> would you build an old version of util-vserver?
>
>
because that version worked for us right now, stable and well tested in our
environment. I intend to test newer version but only for testing box first
rather than in production - things need to change slowly here - to
avoid surprises :-)



> might end up with unexpected failures
>
>
OK so the statement is still stand right - I tested and used without
dietlibc and have no problem so far. But I will build it with dietlibc
anyway. yum search dietlibc does not produc any result - however

Many thanks for your kindly help.

cheers,


-- 
Steve Kieu


the question which comes to my mind here is: why the hell
would you build an old version of util-vserver?


because that version worked for us right now, stable and well tested in our environment. I intend to test newer version but only for testing box first rather than in production - things need to change slowly here - to avoid surprises :-)

 
might end up with unexpected failures


OK so the statement is still stand right - I tested and used without dietlibc and have no problem so far. But I will build it with dietlibc anyway. yum search dietlibc does not produc any result - however 

Many thanks for your kindly help.

cheers,


--
Steve Kieu