Subject:Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release
From:Lukasz Czarnowski <relaks@o2.pl>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:59:32 +0200

 Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:59:32 +0200
On 2 08 2011 19:17 Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com> wrote:

> Exactly.  I'm currently running .32 and .38 on my servers, but as they
> are "satisfactory" today, I would have no particular desire to see them
> improved further.  If I bought new hardware or had a desire to change
> the running kernel then it would be because I needed some new feature in
> 3.x or whatever
> 
> I think a few folks are still saying .32 because it's what they are
> running today (that's what I'm running also).  However, remember you
> need to think about what you want to run in 1-2 years time... (this
> doesn't mean you Adrian, just trying to influence people generally!)

Sure. 

Daniel suggested a good solution:

> My vote is for 3.0. I will likely keep maintaining my RHEL6-based
> 2.6.32 kernel and backport the majority of changes done for the
> stabilization there.

Best regards,
-- 
Lukasz Czarnowski