Subject: Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 13:18:26 +0200

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:19:44PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > options IMHO are:
> 
> >  - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term)
> >  - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet)
> >  - 3.0.x    (immature, but the future)
> 
> here the status so far:
> all the money so far is on 2.6.32.x while the majority 
> votes for 3.0.x ...

As far as I see I'm the only one who pledges for ::1 isolation,
am I correct?
 
>                       2.6.32.x  2.6.38.x  3.0.x   Other   $$$
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Tor Rune Skoglund         -         -       X       -
> Gordan Bobic              -         X       X       -
> John A. Sullivan III      -         -       X       -
> Roman Vesely              X         -       -       -     500 USD
> Nikolay Kichukov          X         -       -       -
> Michael Auckland          -         -       X       -
> Mr Jarry                  -         -       -       X
> Corey Wright              X         -       -       -
> Sandino Araico Sánchez    X         -       -       -     200 USD
> Romain Riviere            -         X       X       -
> 
> please correct me if I did misinterpret any response ...
> 
> best,
> Herbert
> 
> > note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization
> > will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to
> > port such a kernel to the other branch (without need
> > to redo all the testing and review)
> 
> > please share your thoughts and preferences in this
> > thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to
> 
> > thanks in advance,
> > Herbert
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="leitlhttp://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE