Subject: Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release
From:Sandino Araico Sánchez <sandino@sandino.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:27:06 -0500
Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:27:06 -0500
On 28/07/11 08:36, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> options IMHO are:
>
>   - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term)
>   - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet)
>   - 3.0.x    (immature, but the future)
>
> note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization
> will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to
> port such a kernel to the other branch (without need
> to redo all the testing and review)
>
> please share your thoughts and preferences in this
> thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to
>
> thanks in advance,
> Herbert
>

I have sent my donation.

My vote is for stabilizing 2.6.32 because that's what I use in most of 
my production servers.
I will also try to contribute with the grsec-vserver patch if my time 
availability permits it.

-- 
Sandino Araico Sánchez
http://sandino.net



On 28/07/11 08:36, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
options IMHO are:

 - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term)
 - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet)
 - 3.0.x    (immature, but the future)

note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization
will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to
port such a kernel to the other branch (without need
to redo all the testing and review)

please share your thoughts and preferences in this
thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to

thanks in advance,
Herbert


I have sent my donation.

My vote is for stabilizing 2.6.32 because that's what I use in most of my production servers.
I will also try to contribute with the grsec-vserver patch if my time availability permits it.
-- 
Sandino Araico Sánchez 
http://sandino.net