Subject: Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release
From: Roman Vesely <roman@liten.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:03:24 +0200

 Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:03:24 +0200
V Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:49:41 +0200
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> napsáno:

> >> note that whatever kernel we choose, the stabilization
> >> will be for that kernel only, i.e. there is no way to
> >> port such a kernel to the other branch (without need
> >> to redo all the testing and review)
> 
> >> please share your thoughts and preferences in this
> >> thread so that we get an idea where we are heading to
> 
> > Ok, I paid $ 500 (two working nights ;-)
> very appreciated! 
> I added an entry on the Wiki.
> 
> > I prefer stable and supported system.
> > (Debian stable, LTS kernel from kernel.org and LTS 
> > vserver patch, like 2.2.0.x branch or openvz style support) 
> 
> I don't see OpenVZ support anything but RHEL ...
> I also take this as vote for 2.6.32.x, please clarify
> if I'm mistaken ...



Yes, I thought 2.6.32.x
2.6.32 is best choice for sysadmin's (used by all major distributions)

I think 2.6.32.x is a good choice for vserver team - less work and time than 3.x kernel.

Roman