Subject: Re: [vserver] Re: [Freedombox-discuss] [vserver] Re: A software architecture for the FreedomBox
From: "Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@cyber-office.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:52:03 -0700

Ghislain wrote:
>> but that would still be relatively expensive - KSM iterates through
>> and dedupes all the madvise()-ed memory every few seconds. In
>> comparison, the vserver's hashify feature is free in terms of run-time
>> overheads.
>>
>> Gordan
>>
> 
> this is why i love vserver  they all ways seems to choose the simplest
> and most efficient way. They follow the KISS principle very well and
> really this is why this is such a great project.

+3

Though not familiar with all the nuts-and-bolts/bits-and bytes of the 
kernel.  Heck not even close I keep seeing the same thing.  A simple and 
clean implementation.


\\||/
Rod
--