thanks, ok. i will try with util-vserver 30.216 cheers Wojciech Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:49:37PM +0000, Wojciech Giel wrote: > >> Herbert Poetzl wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:41:55PM +0000, Wojciech Giel wrote: >>> > > >>>> Hi, >>>> > > >>>> I'm running VS on ubuntu server 8.04. I used before kernel from >>>> http://ppa.launchpad.net/christoph-lukas/ppa/ubuntu hardy and >>>> everything was fine but when I upgraded with kernel to 2.6.32.25 >>>> and vs2.3.0.36.29.6. >>>> > > >>> first, why upgrade the kernel when everything was fine? >>> second, if you upgrade, why to a kernel which is quite >>> old compared to recent kernels? >>> > > >> My bioinf team think of moving from ubuntu server 8.04 guest to 10.4. >> I have tried to run 10.4 but cannot start it. upstart patch and >> configuration given on VS website didn't work. when I ps aux in guest >> I got continuous root (.....) init. so next step was to compile a >> newer kernel so i've decided to check the long support 2.6.32 line. on >> this server 10.4 VS starts but when i ssh to ex. stats host in comand >> prompt betasms (guest - 10.4) the same when I ssh to any other guest. >> >>>> when I ssh to host or any guests I get different hostname. >>>> It is floating somehow. >>>> > > >>> I doubt that the hostname is 'floating' around somehow. >>> > > >> Yes i realized it is only vs with 10.4. >> >>>> What might be a problem? >>>> > > >>> I presume that the hostname just changes every now and >>> then, which might be a side effect of not having proper >>> guest isolation (which usually is the result of using >>> too old util-vserver for your kernel) >>> > > >> i have 30.214 util-vserver from repository. should I try to compile >> latest stable .30.215 or experimental? >> > > let me check, hmm ... > 0.30.214 released September 2007 > 0.30.215 released March 2008, > 2.6.32 kernel, released December 2009 > > so yes, you need to update util-vserver and no > neither 0.30.214 nor 0.30.215 will work with > a kernel newer than 2.6.22 mainly because the > namespaces were not part of the kernel back > then ... > > HTC, > Herbert > > >> thanks >> Wojciech >> > > >>> best, >>> Herbert >>> > > >>>> thanks >>>> Wojciech >>>> > >