Subject: Re: [vserver] VServer vs OpenVZ.
From: Michael <michael.auckland@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:25:02 +1300
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:25:02 +1300
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:37 PM, onlyjob <onlyjob@gmail.com> wrote:

> A year ago I moved from OpenVZ to Vserver - it was all good - no
> regrets whatsoever. Somehow I found memory management easier for
> VServer. It could be just my perception but to me Vserver is easier to
> configure and use. Debian make VServer installation trivial. I have
> more than 20 VMs for about a year now - all working flawlessly.
>


The same story for me. After using OpenVZ with 10VM for 3month - moved all
of them to vserver.
Alll problem with VZ was relative to memory.....
from other side networking easier on VZ ( it is emulating ),  but vserver
faster  ( no emulation )

-- 
--
Michael




On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:37 PM, onlyjob <onlyjob@gmail.com> wrote:
A year ago I moved from OpenVZ to Vserver - it was all good - no
regrets whatsoever. Somehow I found memory management easier for
VServer. It could be just my perception but to me Vserver is easier to
configure and use. Debian make VServer installation trivial. I have
more than 20 VMs for about a year now - all working flawlessly.


The same story for me. After using OpenVZ with 10VM for 3month - moved all of them to vserver.
Alll problem with VZ was relative to memory.....
from other side networking easier on VZ ( it is emulating ),  but vserver faster  ( no emulation )

--
--
Michael