On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:00:36AM +0930, Mike O'Connor wrote: > On 6/09/10 8:11 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote: > > Hi Guys > > I just tried to upgrade to the kernel above, the system booted well but > > a vserver-stat did not show any guests running. > > I can not be sure but I think they may have actual been running because > > the shutdown process did take some time like it normally does. > > Any ideas ? > > Note. I tried compiling a newer version of util-vservers but because > > util-vservers seems to be written to use the latest tools available it > > would not compile into a package. > > Thanks > > Mike > I have a debian lenny system which I'm compile > util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2913 on, the packages compile except for a > requirement for python-2.6 which I've overridden. what exaclty are you doing to compile (what packages)? > The issue is that the resulting packages do not have any of the files > that should be there. Here is an example of the util-server directory in > the debian build area > apps1:/usr/src/util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2913/debian# find util-vserver > util-vserver > util-vserver/DEBIAN > util-vserver/DEBIAN/control > util-vserver/DEBIAN/md5sums > util-vserver/usr > util-vserver/usr/share > util-vserver/usr/share/doc > util-vserver/usr/share/doc/util-vserver > util-vserver/usr/share/doc/util-vserver/copyright > util-vserver/usr/share/doc/util-vserver/README.gz > util-vserver/usr/share/doc/util-vserver/changelog.Debian.gz > util-vserver/usr/share/doc/util-vserver/NEWS.gz > util-vserver/usr/share/doc/util-vserver/changelog.gz > apps1:/usr/src/util-vserver-0.30.216-pre2913/debian# find util-vserver > Where as the tmp directory where all the files where initial build to > is full of the files. debian builds in /tmp ?! > tmp > tmp/var > tmp/var/run [rest zapped] > I can not use the prebuild debian packages at > http://repo.psand.net/info/ as they insist on having the files in > locations which break my system. well, what about building them the old fashioned way with ./configure, make, make install install-distribution? best, Herbert > Thanks > Mike > >