On Thu June 10 2010, Gordan Bobic wrote: > On 06/10/2010 01:53 AM, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 06:08:27PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 05:01:12PM +0100, Gordan Bobic wrote: > >>>> Can you cut& paste the exact rm command you use? > > > >>> He did. The find command execs 'rm -f' on all the files it finds that > >>> have a hard link count of 1. Or am I misunderstanding your question? > > > >> Oh, so > >> find /var/lib/vservers/.hash -type f -links 1 -exec rm -v '{}' ';' > > > >> does it for Debian, then. I thought I was missing something. > >> Below did strike as a bit much space for 253 barebone guests. > > > >> beryllium:~# df -k > >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > >> /dev/sda1 73742752 42989868 27006932 62% / > > > > this shows me that you do not favor a good design, as > > putting _everything_ on one partition (including the > > guests, which might need/want filesystem tagging sooner > > or later) ... > > Can you please explain exactly what you mean here? What potential issues > do you see from guest and host files being on the same file system? > The difference between taking down the host and 253 (paying?) guests with a single file system failure; vs Only taking down one of them (or some small set). And you aren't even using RAID for storage. Duh... Other (should be obvious) reasons. Mike > Gordan > >