Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:17:44PM -0400, John A. Sullivan III wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 19:34 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: >>> John A. Sullivan III wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 16:20 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: >>>>> Anyone running CentOS as their host distribution tried a "yum update" >>>>> that would include the upgrade to CentOS 5.4? > >>>>> If what kind of results did you get and did you have any problems? > >>>>> TIA, >>>>> Rod >>>> I did quite a while ago and I don't remember the details. I think I had >>>> to back-level all the util-vserver packages but I believe that is from >>>> the dhozac repository and had nothing to do with the 5.4 upgrade. > >>> Thanks John. > >>> I have Daniel's repo enabled by default so the new util-vserver* >>> packages show up plus a new yum. > >>> The last time I upgraded (5.2 to 5.3) I got caught by the old yum. I've >>> excluded it from the regular repos so should be safe now. > >>> \\||/ >>> Rod >> The newer util-vserver packages may give you grief depending on your >> kernel. We are still running 2.6.28.7-vs2.3.0.36.7 and our vservers >> will not start if we use the latest util-vserver packages. Well I'm running kernel 2.6.22.19-vs2.3.0.34.1 and util-vserver-*-0.30.216-1.pre2793.el5.centos. There is no kernel update available but there is a util-vserver.*-0.30.216-1.pre2855.el5 So now I'm a little concerned about doing an update and should I do some hoop-jumping to get a later kernel? Rod -- > interesting, what does 'latest util-vserver' mean for you? > and do you have any error messages produced by them? > > TIA, > Herbert > >> We had to downgrade - John