Subject: Re: [vserver] Stabilization and Testing ...
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:38:12 +0200

On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:14:23AM -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> On Fri October 9 2009, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> > 
> > Dear Community!
> > 
> > as I already announced some time ago, we started to
> > stabilize the Linux-VServer patchset to produce a
> > development version and after further stabilization
> > a new stable release ...
> > 
> > I already cleaned up the scheduler stuff, incorporating
> > the upcoming CFS hard limits, and most of the filesystem
> > related code. during this, we added back support for
> > cluster filesystem like ocfs2 and gfs2, and first
> > support for the new btrfs filesystem. naturally this
> > needs some extensive testing, which I'd gladly out-
> > source to persons willing to help there ... please
> > contact me (preferably on IRC) for details.
> > 
> > there will be more testing to be done in the near
> > future and I'll setup a wiki page to coordinate this
> > and allow for some kind of 'checklist' ... speaking
> > of wiki pages, I added a new one with a list of hardware
> > I'd be interested in, so if you want to say thanks,
> > and don't want to spend time on testing or similar,
> > please don't hesitate to pick something from there :)
> > 
> > http://linux-vserver.org/Make_Bertl_Happy_Hardware_List

> That Samsung drive is relatively slow - you might want
> to re-think that one.

okay, what about the Western Digital Caviar Green 
1500GB, 32MB Cache, SATA II (WD15EADS) instead?

thanks,
Herbert

> Mike
> > TIA,
> > Herbert
> > 
> > 
> > 
>