Subject: Re: [vserver] Debian Support
From: Laurent Spagnol <laurent.spagnol@univ-reims.fr>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:17:05 +0200

Nikolay Kichukov a écrit :
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am a big fan of Debian, however I always use vanilla kernel + vserver experimental
patches and compile the
> util-vserver tools from source. Not the debian way, but good enough for a standalone
box under my full control.
>   
Hi,

At first, on Debian / Sarge, i prefered to build kernel myself (outdated 
kernel version).
With Debian / Etch, the Debian's packages were good enough to be used as 
this.
And now, Debian / Lenny, has another kind of problem: mismatch between 
kernel and patch.

In my opinion, kernel is one of the most easy thing to build / change 
(less than 5 min on a recent smp machine).
The proof: a very old Redhat (7.3 i386) that was originally running on a 
poor P4, works now perfectly on a SMP machine with an amd64 kernel !

In fact, we don't have to run after the latest kernel releases, and in 
most of the cases the security holes comes from userland applications ...

So:
- i build my own kernels (IPv6, 'pseudo' loopback,  and some new 
features that are usefull for me),
- i take stability and updates from Debian,
- and i continue to use my favorite distribution ;)




> Cheers,
> - -Nik
>
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>   
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:46:18PM +0200, Meik Sievertsen (new-data-services GmbH)
wrote:
>>     
>>> Timothee Besset wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Eugen Leitl wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:01:39AM +0100, ben@bristolwireless.net wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Personally I was really hoping to see a better quality Linux-Vserver  
>>>>>> support in Debian this time, so sad news.
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Me, too.
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Anyone else any feelings about this? Any chance of a rescue attempt?
>>>>>>             
>>>>> I think that sucks big time. I'm willing to help with testing, if
>>>>> that's of any help.
>>>>>           
>>>> Same, we use vserver exclusively on Debian.
>>>>         
>>> For us as well - we only use Debian and if there will be no longer 
>>> linux-vserver support we will simply use a different product.
>>>       
>> well, it's sad to see what power a distributor holds
>> despite the fact that the debian Linux-VServer kernels
>> have gotten really bad over time, religious debian users
>> (like yourself?) cling to those broken kernels without
>> ever considering an alternative ...
>>
>> best,
>> Herbert
>>
>>     
>>> Regards,
>>> Meik.
>>>       
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKwzn5AAoJEDFLYVOGGjgX3/YH+wThoC+jilTu0Ut5fTFpOhRd
> sFdcZN0SJPFA9ZsPxlC3xHxUfdl9BEdPaFpUchEaUXJN/mEXMhPBGWpl+WfIQFr4
> 1JJSwffbju+/r20mzshr9LmiVnZqynrugd0BQa+TN0/TTXRyzeUZVhO/9erA9dkQ
> YDbz3KNSTA544RjSzOzFIc9MKUfm2NDnxqBlZnXrTMqybTuI7Mi2buoLjkQeie+M
> 0ZCGfTvPc9wjoHJWpmD9223TfLWt96uhZ6DBptUrqxKT7ezGYhojegPX4yINshDB
> 274fbNm7aVsw/XONuMkDAYdPIXV4XorhUyECZn3BV/wTXeY/JtzPVKFcDeFQWGg=
> =iPdW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>   


-- 
Laurent Spagnol
Administrateur Linux

Université de Reims
Centre de Ressources Informatiques

Campus du Moulin de la Housse
BP 1039 - 51687 Reims cedex 2

Tel: 03.26.91.88.32
Fax: 03.26.91.31.87