On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 14:27 +0200, ADNET Ghislain wrote:
> i think :
>
> Use dietlibc: no (you have been warned)
>
> is B.A.D you should use dietlibc for vserver utils, at least if not "you have been
warned" :)
IIRC that was due to glibc will pull in libs dynamically, even if linked
statically. I don't think uclibc have this problem so I don't see any
point in building dietlibc.
I actually tried to build dietlibc but it looks like I'd have to disable
SSP then.
Does anyone have an exploit/proof-of-concept testcase I could try?
-nc