Subject: Re: [vserver] KVM in a guest, security implications?
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:58:26 +0100

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 05:28:36PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> 
> >the TBS is (currently) off, since the mainline scheduler was changed to 
> >CFS (completely fair scheduler), no idea
> 
> I didn't realize that. Is this because the switch to CFS presents
> changes to the TBS and some work needs to be done to reintegrate
> it, or because CFS can somehow replace the functionality of TBS (at
> first look it doesn't do things like sched_hard, but I may be missing
> something).

the former

best,
Herbert

> Grisha