On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:06:24AM +0200, Peter Mann wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:21:51AM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 06:42:54PM +0200, Peter Mann wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 08:26:35PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > > > > > > good support seems to be there for Fedora, Centos, > > > > Gentoo and Mandriva and Debian (but it is recommended > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > to build the kernel yourself) packages should be > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > available for all of them, you might even get away > > > > by using the debian packages for ubuntu > > > > > > why is recommended to build Debian kernel ??? i have no problem > > > with distro kernels > > > > it is recommended to build custom kernels. period. :) > > ok ... i understand "(but it is recommended to build the kernel > yourself)" specifically for Debian in your post, but you mean > "build the kernel yourself" generally??? yep > "good support seems to be there for Fedora, Centos, Gentoo and > ^^^ that should have been a colon too, I probably just forgot about Debian at that point ... > Mandriva and Debian (but it is recommended ..." .... > ^^^ > > why? for several reasons: > > yes ... i agree with all arguments ... so it's no specifically > problem with Debian vserver enabled kernels ... besides the fact that they are sometimes broken, no, the suggestion is for all distros ... best, Herbert > -- > > 5o Peter.Mann at tuke.sk >