On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:12:22AM +0100, Ben Green wrote: > It would be really good to have a working patch with IPv6. > Herbert Poetzl will you consider patching for us? I've uploaded a patch for 4.1.42 with hopefully the right changes to the ipv6 code to make it work in the same way as it did before (needs testing). I will soon update the older long term kernel patches and then start working on the stable mainline branches, so any help there is welcome :) All the best, Herbert > The other possible "revert the conflicting upstream commit before > applying the linux-vserver patch" we could also consider. I have > absolutely no idea what that would do in terms of IPv6, though it > would seem that we've all been running without it for years, and that > it adds a feature for corner case of specific IPv4 mapping that we > could live without. > What do people think? > Cheers, > Ben > Quoting Corey Wright <undefined@pobox.com>: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?h=linux-3.18.y&id=a360eb6f74b999a7546f2542c0d6483fdbb73461 >> you can either: >> * revert the conflicting upstream commit before applying the >> linux-vserver patch. >> * apply my patch which *ignorantly* merges the two (giving preference to >> the linux-vserver code as i don't use ipv6). >> * ask somebody (herbert?) to *intelligently* fix-up the vserver patch.