Sun, 7 Nov 2010 17:15:57 +0100
I hope I have fixed it.
they change the board to a Chipsatz AMD 780G/SB700,
such a have already in use.
however maybe the pictures are usefully.
2.6.36 the same trouble as by this shown by pic.
(2.6.18-194.11.3.el5-x86 64)
THX
Roman
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:herbert@13thfloor.at]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 07. November 2010 14:29
An: Roman Pretory
Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Betreff: [SPAM? 1.99] Re: Re: [vserver] Centos kernel
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:43:45PM +0100, Roman Pretory wrote:
> which Kernel/patch whould you take.
defintely 2.6.36
> boot.log is empty how to fill, but I have screen shots
usually the bootup log can be captured via serial console
(which is strongly advised on a server setup anyways)
but if you have a complete set of screen shots it should
be fine as well (just make sure nothing is missing)
> Motherboard is a n3m78-vm
> Chipsatz: GeForce 8200
> THX Roman
best,
Herbert
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:herbert@13thfloor.at]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 07. November 2010 09:41
> An: Roman Pretory
> Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> Betreff: [SPAM? 1.99] Re: [vserver] Centos kernel
>
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 03:23:31AM +0100, Roman Pretory wrote:
>
> > Hello
>
> > Have a system by a provider running fine with the Centos5.5,
>
> okay ...
>
> > but kernel.panic the the latest Kernel from
> > http://rpm.hozac.com/dhozac/centos/5/vserver/x86 64/
>
> the 'latest' kernel there is almost a year old, and
> IMHO not the best choice for a system nowadays, mainly
> because it will have several security issues discovered
> and fixed since in mainline
>
> in any case, upload the bootup log and resulting panic
> so that we can take a look what happens ...
>
> > What I found out it is a Asus board with AMD Chipset and
> > Northbridgeby nVidia Series mctr
>
> not the best choice, but should work with a recent kernel
>
> > Is there a way to patch the Centos kernel by using kernel.devel ??
>
> probably, you just need to adapt one of the old patches
> to you hybrid kernel and of course test/debug the result
>
> > 2.6.18-194.11.3.el5-x86 64 what for a patch version is to beused
>
> parts from 2.6.18 up to the recent kernels I guess, unless
> the centos folks got lazy and stopped backporting
>
> > same prozedure?
>
> same procedure as every year, roman!
>
> best,
> Herbert
>
> > THX
> > Roman
>
["image/gif" not shown]
["image/gif" not shown]
["image/gif" not shown]