Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
>
> Content, and basic properties. Hashifying a file owned by root and one
> owned by a user would be rather bad...
>
Hmm, assuming that link breaking on change *is* enabled, then actually I
don't immediately see the problem with that one? Obviously it's not a
safe suggestion unless link breaking is enabled, but subject to that
caveat I can't immediately see how it could be exploited to do something
naughty?
Ed