Quoting Corey Wright <undefined@pobox.com>: > i'm still going to keep on doing what i'm doing, so i don't really care (just > perturbed by the individuals asking for updated patches, but ignoring my > contribution and not offering compensation to Herbert.) Have done a quick search I see you mostly patch 3.10. Is that right? In the repositories I do have 3.10 kernels, but they are not a focus for me. There have been issues reported with 3.10, but so far as I can see no code to demostrate exactly what they are, still, I have doubt on the 3.10 kernel as a long term deployment option. The situation will get more urgent as Debian Jessie approaches release, and I'll be looking at finding a stable, but more recent, kernel to deploy. Until then 3.10 does not interest me as much as 3.2 and 3.4 on which many of use have built our systems. I would be happy to have a separate kernel package to test patches with, giving it a different name to the beng kernels, but I would be unable to update it too frequently, but I would need to following things in order to make this practical: the presence of the patch, documented as to its use, consistently named, on a web site somewhere. I know you already post this information to the mailing list, but I need to be able to go to central store of information that I can have a look at, see what's available and set off some compilation. Sorry if its a weak offer. I'm incredibly busy at the moment. Cheers, Ben