-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am a big fan of Debian, however I always use vanilla kernel + vserver experimental patches and compile the util-vserver tools from source. Not the debian way, but good enough for a standalone box under my full control. Cheers, - -Nik Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:46:18PM +0200, Meik Sievertsen (new-data-services GmbH) wrote: >> Timothee Besset wrote: >>> Eugen Leitl wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:01:39AM +0100, ben@bristolwireless.net wrote: > >>>>> Personally I was really hoping to see a better quality Linux-Vserver >>>>> support in Debian this time, so sad news. > >>>> Me, too. > >>>>> Anyone else any feelings about this? Any chance of a rescue attempt? > >>>> I think that sucks big time. I'm willing to help with testing, if >>>> that's of any help. > >>> Same, we use vserver exclusively on Debian. > >> For us as well - we only use Debian and if there will be no longer >> linux-vserver support we will simply use a different product. > > well, it's sad to see what power a distributor holds > despite the fact that the debian Linux-VServer kernels > have gotten really bad over time, religious debian users > (like yourself?) cling to those broken kernels without > ever considering an alternative ... > > best, > Herbert > >> Regards, >> Meik. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKwzn5AAoJEDFLYVOGGjgX3/YH+wThoC+jilTu0Ut5fTFpOhRd sFdcZN0SJPFA9ZsPxlC3xHxUfdl9BEdPaFpUchEaUXJN/mEXMhPBGWpl+WfIQFr4 1JJSwffbju+/r20mzshr9LmiVnZqynrugd0BQa+TN0/TTXRyzeUZVhO/9erA9dkQ YDbz3KNSTA544RjSzOzFIc9MKUfm2NDnxqBlZnXrTMqybTuI7Mi2buoLjkQeie+M 0ZCGfTvPc9wjoHJWpmD9223TfLWt96uhZ6DBptUrqxKT7ezGYhojegPX4yINshDB 274fbNm7aVsw/XONuMkDAYdPIXV4XorhUyECZn3BV/wTXeY/JtzPVKFcDeFQWGg= =iPdW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----