Subject: Re: [vserver] KVM in a guest, security implications?
From: "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <grisha@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:28:36 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Herbert Poetzl wrote:

> the TBS is (currently) off, since the mainline scheduler was changed to 
> CFS (completely fair scheduler), no idea

I didn't realize that. Is this because the switch to CFS presents changes 
to the TBS and some work needs to be done to reintegrate it, or because 
CFS can somehow replace the functionality of TBS (at first look it doesn't 
do things like sched_hard, but I may be missing something).

Grisha