On Thu March 27 2008 08:12, Natanael Copa wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 08:05 -0500, Michael S. Zick wrote: > > On Thu March 27 2008 04:28, Oliver Welter wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > > are there any schedules for the release of "stable" 2.6.24 patches? I > > > have to upgrade my kernels and if it is a matter of days, I will go > > > directly go on 2.6.24... > > > > > > Are there any known issues with patch-2.6.24-rc6-vs2.2.0.5.0.3? > > > > > > > I know it applies - 2 rejects, the Makefile (or course) and one for fs/proc/array.c > > (If I recall the filename correctly) - which you can ignore - it is trying to comment > > out code which has been removed. > > > > I do not make enough use of it to find problems - it boots and appears to work. > > > > The developers do not appear to be dead - somebody keeps posting patches for 2.6.22-xxx > > but they are very silent on the subject of 2.6.24 (Alpine Linux has a vsgrsec patched > > 2.6.23 - without any clues how they got it). > > No. Alpine Linux have 2 kernels. The 2.6.23 is without vserver patches. > vserver kernel in alpine uses 2.6.22. > Guess I haven't booted both yet or I would have noticed that. > I also wonders how to follow the 2.6.24 progress. Normally you can > follow projects development from svn or git or similar and test the > latest of the latest and submit patches. > > If anyone knows how to follow vserver for 2.6.24 development, please let > us know. > http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/ It sorts by age - always go to the bottom of the page and work up. Mike > -nc > > > Mike > > > > > > Oliver > > >