Subject: Re: [vserver] funding the 5.10 vserver goal
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:00:26 +0200

 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 13:00:26 +0200
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:40:16PM +0200, Thorsten Edler wrote:
> Hi folks,

Hello Thorsten,

> I want to ask, what's about the state of our little
> funding campaign for vserver kernel/patches to 5.10/5.15? 

Got a little delayed because of family stuff and other
work which had to be completed first.

But I'm currently working on the first stage of a 5.x
port which is breaking down the existing patch into
smaller patches which address the various aspects making
up Linux-VServer.

> Is there some "work in progress" or any result at the horizon?

I'd expect that we have some testable patches in a
month or two and likely a final port in September if
all goes as expected.

Hope this clarifies,
Herbert

> Or: Would be @Ben Green an adequate contact person for this
> issue?


> Regards,/Thorsten 
> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------Von: Adrian Butterworth <adrian@economicoutlook.net>
Datum: 09.11.21  02:07  (GMT+01:00) An: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org Cc: Ghislain
Adnet <gadnet@aqueos.com> Betreff: Re: [vserver] funding the 5.10 vserver goal Hi allEO
is fine with 5.15.With a bit of luck it may get a few more years added, else we can
raise funds(Herbert willing) for the next one that does.regardsAdrianOn Thu, November
4, 2021 22:29, Ghislain Adnet wrote:> Le 03/11/2021 à 16:11, Ghislain Adnet a écrit :>>>>
Economic Outlook       500 => 5.10>> aqueos                2500 => 5.15>> roberto               
200 => no preferences>> Tor Rune Skoglund     1000 => 5.15>> Sandino Araico Sánchez 500 => 5.15>>
Thorsten Edler         250 => 5.15>> roman                   50 => ?>> seems i was hasty.>>
Thanks for Tor Rune Skoglund for corecting me here, the consensus is toward> 5.15 LTS
and i welcome it ! :)>> Adrian and Roman, do you have any issue if we go this route
?>>> --> cordialement,> Ghislain ADNET.> AQUEOS.>>