Subject: Re: [vserver] Stable Linux-VServer Release
From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:49:29 +0200

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 05:42:26PM +0200, Jarry wrote:
> On 28-Jul-11 15:36, Herbert Poetzl wrote:

>> options IMHO are:

>>  - 2.6.32.x (has performance issues, but is long term)
>>  - 2.6.38.x (good performance, not longterm yet)
>>  - 3.0.x    (immature, but the future)

> May I ask why you did not include the latest longterm 2.6.35
> (which I'd personally vote for)? I have no info about those
> performance issues of 2.6.32, but they might have been already
> solved in 2.6.35...

nope, first one to get them under control was 2.6.36 which
was rather unuseable for other reasons and the final
improvement IMHO appeared in 2.6.37

in general, I do not consider 2.6.35 a good choice ...
speaking of preference, mine would be on 3.x, mainly because
I think it will take some time to do the testing anyway and
it doesn't look that bad considering the recent patches

best,
Herbert

> Jarry
> -- 
> _______________________________________________________________
> This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists!
> Everything else is considered to be spam and therefore deleted.